Farm Subsidy information
Gila County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Gila County, Arizona, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $3,626,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J-4 Ranch Inc. | Payson, AZ 85541 | $28,754 |
22 | Ash Creek Grazing Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $28,593 |
23 | Griffin Cattle Ranch LLC | Globe, AZ 85502 | $26,167 |
24 | D G Fenn Land & Cattle Co LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85022 | $25,410 |
25 | Anchor Seven Livestock Associatio | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $24,750 |
26 | Hughes Trading Co LLC | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $23,628 |
27 | Point Of Pines Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $23,589 |
28 | The Bar X LLC | Young, AZ 85554 | $22,099 |
29 | O Bar C Ranch LLC | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $22,041 |
30 | Arthur F Rivera | Claypool, AZ 85532 | $21,820 |
31 | Tonto Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $19,916 |
32 | Rafter P Ranch LLC | Globe, AZ 85502 | $19,391 |
33 | Potato Butte Ranch LLC | Young, AZ 85554 | $15,870 |
34 | Cassie Waggoner | Globe, AZ 85501 | $13,376 |
35 | Forestdale Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $12,922 |
36 | Webb Cattle Company | Phoenix, AZ 85008 | $12,738 |
37 | Burgett & Sons LLC | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $11,888 |
38 | Troy Neal | Payson, AZ 85541 | $9,661 |
39 | Becky Hill | Payson, AZ 85541 | $9,284 |
40 | Melvin Warbington | Globe, AZ 85501 | $8,789 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”