Farm Subsidy information

Gila County, Arizona

Total USDA Subsidies in Gila County, Arizona, 2019‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21

Recipients of Total USDA Subsidies from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $3,281,000 in in 2019‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total USDA Subsidies
2019
1Ash Creek Grazing Association *San Carlos, AZ 85550$117,250
2Point Of Pines Livestock Associat *San Carlos, AZ 85550$117,250
3North Fork Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$117,250
4Carrizo Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$96,993
5Slaughter Mountain Livestock Asso *San Carlos, AZ 85550$90,997
6Anchor Seven Livestock Associatio *San Carlos, AZ 85550$88,702
7White Mountain Apache Tribe *Whiteriver, AZ 85941$46,741
8Tonto Livestock Association *San Carlos, AZ 85550$44,124
9Turkey Creek Livestock AssociatioWhiteriver, AZ 85941$39,314
10Cedar Creek Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$36,549
11Daniel J CooperYoung, AZ 85554$35,276
12Muleshoe X Cattle CoPine, AZ 85544$29,778
13Joshua Jesse RoundyRoosevelt, AZ 85545$25,270
14Canyon Day Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$20,228
15Forestdale Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$18,310
16Grasshopper Livestock AssociationCibecue, AZ 85911$17,886
17Page Cattle Company *Phoenix, AZ 85037$13,306
18Cibecue Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$11,073
19Oak Creek Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$6,772
20Rafter O Land And Cattle LLCGlobe, AZ 85501$1,131

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag