Counter Cyclical Program in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 441
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $138,414,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | O & E Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $3,733,365 |
2 | P R P Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $3,643,837 |
3 | Brooks Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $3,633,068 |
4 | Pioneer Ranches | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $3,337,910 |
5 | H Four Farms III | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $3,292,975 |
6 | Catron Cotton Co | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $3,007,633 |
7 | Green Acres Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $2,980,082 |
8 | A Tumbling T Ranches | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $2,664,192 |
9 | Associated Farming 92 | Mesa, AZ 85213 | $2,460,146 |
10 | Santa Lucia Farms G P 97 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $2,316,692 |
11 | Gingg Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,274,098 |
12 | Rogers Brothers Farms Ptnshp | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $1,977,400 |
13 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $1,924,330 |
14 | Legacy Farming Company | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $1,824,688 |
15 | Desert Conservation Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $1,759,540 |
16 | Ross Farms | Sedona, AZ 86336 | $1,735,805 |
17 | New Magma Farms Ptshp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,731,304 |
18 | Waddell General Ptn 93 | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $1,716,465 |
19 | Sunset Farms | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $1,618,872 |
20 | S D Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $1,597,279 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>