Farm Subsidy information
Maricopa County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,292
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $664,337,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | H Four Farms III | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $15,001,510 |
2 | O & E Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $14,554,854 |
3 | P R P Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $13,440,986 |
4 | A Tumbling T Ranches | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $12,761,145 |
5 | Pioneer Ranches | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $9,367,844 |
6 | Gingg Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $9,048,388 |
7 | Catron Cotton Co | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $8,779,023 |
8 | Associated Farming 92 | Mesa, AZ 85213 | $8,610,505 |
9 | Gladden Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $8,145,678 |
10 | Green Acres Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $7,629,609 |
11 | Rogers Brothers Farms Ptnshp | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $7,271,692 |
12 | Santa Lucia Farms G P 97 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $7,180,737 |
13 | Brooks Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $7,087,533 |
14 | Martori Family Gen Ptn | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $6,869,823 |
15 | S D Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $6,762,372 |
16 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $6,592,005 |
17 | New Magma Farms Ptshp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $6,122,033 |
18 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $6,007,300 |
19 | Waddell General Ptn 93 | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $5,852,167 |
20 | Discovery West Ranches Partners | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $5,580,031 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>