Total Commodity Programs in Mohave County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 125
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mohave County, Arizona totaled $23,559,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fort Mojave Tribe | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $7,385,338 |
| 2 | Fort Mojave Indian Tribe Fmit Avi Kwa Ame Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $3,152,389 |
| 3 | Mohave Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85008 | $2,837,405 |
| 4 | V & K Wakimoto Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $1,231,702 |
| 5 | 4 B Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85008 | $1,230,096 |
| 6 | Esperanza Farming Co | Bullhead City, AZ 86442 | $896,746 |
| 7 | Vanderslice Farms Southwest LLC | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $861,990 |
| 8 | Dorame Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $417,593 |
| 9 | Dorame Brothers Custom Hay | Blythe, CA 92226 | $385,721 |
| 10 | Wakimoto Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $377,386 |
| 11 | Francis Creek Ranch LLC | Kingman, AZ 86402 | $286,370 |
| 12 | Laughlin Land & Cattle Co | Bullhead City, AZ 86429 | $275,104 |
| 13 | Dorame Farms Inc | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $255,763 |
| 14 | Adam White | Lake Havasu City, AZ 86406 | $250,000 |
| 15 | South Sound Fisheries Inc | Lake Havasu City, AZ 86406 | $229,268 |
| 16 | Brannan Rowe | Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403 | $224,312 |
| 17 | Vanderslice Farms Inc | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $185,088 |
| 18 | Del's Desert Magic Farms | Bullhead City, AZ 86442 | $183,814 |
| 19 | Charles W Hamilton Irrevocable Trust | Dolan Springs, AZ 86441 | $146,990 |
| 20 | Emmett J Sturgill | Kingman, AZ 86409 | $141,520 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf