Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Pinal County, Arizona, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 158
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $7,027,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ak-chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $308,002 |
2 | Gila River Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $276,834 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $260,704 |
4 | T-k Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $242,604 |
5 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $234,535 |
6 | A & B Farms Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $234,501 |
7 | Tempe Farming Co | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $197,953 |
8 | Donley Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $167,502 |
9 | Terra Firma | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $144,013 |
10 | Sierra Farming Partnership III | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $135,451 |
11 | Fast Track Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $112,769 |
12 | Keeling Family Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $111,906 |
13 | Catalina Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $108,214 |
14 | Agri-bella Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $107,937 |
15 | Hiscox Farms Gp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $107,638 |
16 | Mark D Smith Enterprises Inc | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $104,225 |
17 | Dust Boll Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $87,504 |
18 | Ramona Enterprises LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $80,554 |
19 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $78,662 |
20 | Rio Farming General Partnership | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $78,267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>