Total Disaster Programs in Santa Cruz County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 63
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Santa Cruz County, Arizona totaled $1,726,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | C 6 Ranch LLC | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $21,760 |
22 | Ramon De La Ossa Dba R Bar 9 Trust | Patagonia, AZ 85624 | $20,495 |
23 | James Pyeatt | Elgin, AZ 85611 | $19,984 |
24 | Marie Pyeatt | Elgin, AZ 85611 | $19,900 |
25 | Samuel C Sedgwick | Tucson, AZ 85704 | $19,618 |
26 | Salero Dos LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85250 | $19,214 |
27 | William Schock | Elgin, AZ 85611 | $18,086 |
28 | Rose Tree Cattle Co Lllp | Elgin, AZ 85611 | $16,852 |
29 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $16,691 |
30 | Samuel B Donaldson | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $16,319 |
31 | Mark T Byrum | Patagonia, AZ 85624 | $15,286 |
32 | J David Lowell | Rio Rico, AZ 85648 | $15,036 |
33 | Santo Nino | Patagonia, AZ 85624 | $15,011 |
34 | Sopori Land & Cattle Company LLC | Amado, AZ 85645 | $14,070 |
35 | Thomas F Hardesty Dba Hardesty Ca | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $13,239 |
36 | Agua Caliente Ranch LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85255 | $9,381 |
37 | Brush Hill Land & Cattle Co LLC | Patagonia, AZ 85624 | $9,251 |
38 | Klein Ranches K Bar K LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85259 | $8,774 |
39 | Canelo Hills Vineyard And Winery | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $8,184 |
40 | Horton E Noon Residual Trust | Nogales, AZ 85621 | $6,677 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”