Deficiency Payment in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,078
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $32,295,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bullock Farms Partnership | De Witt, AR 72042 | $332,414 |
2 | Hornbeck Brothers | De Witt, AR 72042 | $305,895 |
3 | Triple T Farms | Almyra, AR 72003 | $296,325 |
4 | James F Moss & Sons | Almyra, AR 72003 | $231,922 |
5 | D & S Farms---stephens | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $182,346 |
6 | Bohanan & Son | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $170,138 |
7 | E & J Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $167,587 |
8 | Triple C Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $164,219 |
9 | Padgett Farms | Ethel, AR 72048 | $158,255 |
10 | Miller Farms Partnership | De Witt, AR 72042 | $158,239 |
11 | Larry & Vickie Rabeneck Farms | De Witt, AR 72042 | $157,755 |
12 | Lepine Brothers | De Witt, AR 72042 | $153,542 |
13 | Gene Boyd LLC | De Witt, AR 72042 | $140,064 |
14 | Ellenburg Farm | Crocketts Bluff, AR 72038 | $137,993 |
15 | Bob A Bell & Joan Mcferrin Ptr | De Witt, AR 72042 | $136,472 |
16 | Jam H & Son R Rubach | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $135,232 |
17 | Allen Brothers | De Witt, AR 72042 | $134,917 |
18 | Baker Brothers | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $130,748 |
19 | Thayn & Sally Morton Fms Jv | De Witt, AR 72042 | $126,512 |
20 | S & D Farm Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $124,624 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>