Farm Subsidy information
Chicot County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,555
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $546,637,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yocum Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $8,951,243 |
| 2 | Bank Of Lake Village | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $8,446,672 |
| 3 | Bobby Roark & Sons Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $6,484,395 |
| 4 | Bill Elliott Jr & Bruce Elliott Ptr | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $5,935,794 |
| 5 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $5,541,498 |
| 6 | Epstein Land Co | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $5,538,332 |
| 7 | Sampolesi Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $4,074,214 |
| 8 | Bennett And Son | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $4,060,257 |
| 9 | Ashton General Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $3,924,935 |
| 10 | M & T Farms Partnership | Eudora, AR 71640 | $3,405,447 |
| 11 | Poole Farms | Parkdale, AR 71661 | $3,306,933 |
| 12 | Hensley Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $3,248,438 |
| 13 | B & R Farms | Greenville, MS 38701 | $3,203,814 |
| 14 | Larry And Doreen Pieroni Farm Par | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $3,105,546 |
| 15 | Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint Venture | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $3,039,248 |
| 16 | Lane Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $3,029,056 |
| 17 | Delta Production Credit Assn ** | Dermott, AR 71638 | $2,891,747 |
| 18 | B Pieroni Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $2,888,038 |
| 19 | B & B Mencer Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $2,835,497 |
| 20 | Paul And Stacy Dunavant Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $2,805,893 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf