Farm Subsidy information

Chicot County, Arkansas

Total Subsidies in Chicot County, Arkansas, 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 622

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $30,350,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
2020
1Bank Of Lake VillageLake Village, AR 71653$2,768,532
2Simmons 1st National Bank **Lake Village, AR 71653$2,102,503
3Delta Production Credit Assn **Dermott, AR 71638$1,153,165
4Catpro LLCPortland, AR 71663$903,451
5Agheritage **Brinkley, AR 72021$694,310
6Commerce Community Bank/wccb **Oak Grove, LA 71263$503,356
7Mcgehee Bank IncMc Gehee, AR 71654$500,499
8Bill Elliott Jr & Bruce Elliott PtrLake Village, AR 71653$458,820
9Steritz AgLake Village, AR 71653$438,147
10Bellaire Dynamik LLCCharlotte, NC 28273$423,957
11Moyers Fish Farm LLCPortland, AR 71663$382,022
12Bobby Roark & Sons PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$347,493
13Hensley FarmsEudora, AR 71640$322,638
14Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint VentureLake Village, AR 71653$307,485
15Ms Delta Organics LLCLeland, MS 38756$252,418
16Michael Paul Minsky IncEudora, AR 71640$240,720
17Joe Mencer Farms PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$234,562
18Matt And Lisa Fortenberry Joint VentureLake Providence, LA 71254$233,709
19Epstein Land CoLake Village, AR 71653$212,617
20Bayou Mason Planting CompanyEudora, AR 71640$205,370

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag