Loan Deficiency in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 893
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $32,695,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ashcot Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $580,373 |
2 | Duncan Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $570,906 |
3 | Ashton General Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $526,082 |
4 | Paul And Stacy Dunavant Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $509,995 |
5 | Yocum Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $495,344 |
6 | L And L Vaughn Farms Partnership | Monticello, AR 71657 | $452,815 |
7 | Gibbs Kell Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $412,759 |
8 | Fred Lingo | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $330,372 |
9 | Armstrong Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $322,961 |
10 | W C Hatch | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $317,534 |
11 | Mencer Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $301,717 |
12 | Bobby Roark & Sons Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $299,625 |
13 | B & R Farms | Greenville, MS 38701 | $296,795 |
14 | Dennis Huggins | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $286,204 |
15 | Bennett And Son | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $277,529 |
16 | Fred Allen Woodall | Eudora, AR 71640 | $272,139 |
17 | David Steritz | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $267,625 |
18 | Mary Lou Steritz | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $264,289 |
19 | Bobby H Miller | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $247,586 |
20 | Warren Keith Miller | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $247,215 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>