Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 50
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $466,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ashton General Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $60,172 |
2 | Bobby H Miller | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $32,914 |
3 | Janis Rubio | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $31,580 |
4 | C M Helms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $16,987 |
5 | Keller Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $16,800 |
6 | Crooked Bayou Farms Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $15,814 |
7 | William Borgognoni | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $13,574 |
8 | A And M Farms Partnership | Portland, AR 71663 | $13,042 |
9 | Anne Archer Dennington Trust | Dermott, AR 71638 | $12,892 |
10 | Estate Of Fred A Woodall | Eudora, AR 71640 | $12,444 |
11 | Brad Smith | Portland, AR 71663 | $12,070 |
12 | C And K Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $11,169 |
13 | Yocum Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $11,153 |
14 | Ruth S Cranston | Jackson, MS 39216 | $10,500 |
15 | Laverne Mathis | Scott, AR 72142 | $10,500 |
16 | Tony P Borgognoni | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $10,500 |
17 | M And D Crow Farms Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $10,500 |
18 | Road 33 Farms Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $10,500 |
19 | Dixon Farms Partnership | Eudora, AR 71640 | $9,606 |
20 | Will Grubbs | Eudora, AR 71640 | $9,434 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>