Total Commodity Programs in Clay County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,385
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clay County, Arkansas totaled $551,337,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Holifield Farms Ptr | Rector, AR 72461 | $2,568,084 |
22 | Hayes & Hayes Farms Ptr | Rector, AR 72461 | $2,553,005 |
23 | Dodd Brothers | Lafe, AR 72436 | $2,480,458 |
24 | Jimmie A Cole & Son | Reyno, AR 72462 | $2,427,949 |
25 | Williams Farms G P | Corning, AR 72422 | $2,342,426 |
26 | Simmons & Sons Farms | Rector, AR 72461 | $2,260,682 |
27 | Scott R & Tammy Taylor Ptrship | Corning, AR 72422 | $2,186,077 |
28 | Farm Credit Midsouth Pca ** | Barton, AR 72312 | $2,015,502 |
29 | Gaylon Coomer | Greenway, AR 72430 | $1,967,133 |
30 | Jett Family Farms Gp | Success, AR 72470 | $1,910,051 |
31 | A J Brothers Farm Inc | Corning, AR 72422 | $1,894,559 |
32 | Northland Farms Inc | Corning, AR 72422 | $1,875,351 |
33 | C-4-m Joint Venture | Corning, AR 72422 | $1,865,417 |
34 | Betty Bowers Archer | Corning, AR 72422 | $1,862,670 |
35 | Engle Brothers | Rector, AR 72461 | $1,836,038 |
36 | Southland Farms Inc | Corning, AR 72422 | $1,796,576 |
37 | Kathryn Renee Garland | Corning, AR 72422 | $1,795,304 |
38 | Robinson Farms | Corning, AR 72422 | $1,771,502 |
39 | Dane Coomer | Piggott, AR 72454 | $1,759,746 |
40 | Brawner Farms Partnership | Piggott, AR 72454 | $1,752,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”