Total Conservation Programs in Desha County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 291
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Desha County, Arkansas totaled $12,891,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baxter Land Co Inc | Dermott, AR 71638 | $693,730 |
| 2 | Camp Nine Co Inc | Dermott, AR 71638 | $448,628 |
| 3 | Gould Farms Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $366,944 |
| 4 | Robert Moore Jr | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $347,859 |
| 5 | R A Pickens And Son Company | Pickens, AR 71662 | $332,949 |
| 6 | Winchester Land Co Inc | Monticello, AR 71657 | $331,433 |
| 7 | Gladys E Beck Family Trust | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $318,151 |
| 8 | R A Pickens & Son | Pickens, AR 71662 | $313,577 |
| 9 | Larry Linn | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $292,814 |
| 10 | Baco Diversified Inc | Dermott, AR 71638 | $292,263 |
| 11 | Howard A Rands Sr Trust | Dumas, AR 71639 | $266,319 |
| 12 | Mud Lake Farm LLC | Dumas, AR 71639 | $265,341 |
| 13 | Mccallie Bros Inc | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $245,838 |
| 14 | Stephen M Fuller | Tillar, AR 71670 | $244,243 |
| 15 | Yancopin Company | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $228,706 |
| 16 | Mary Gannaway Tucker | Monticello, AR 71655 | $222,028 |
| 17 | Gum Point Land Co LLC | Dumas, AR 71639 | $220,488 |
| 18 | Hollywood Plantation | Fort Smith, AR 72913 | $208,283 |
| 19 | Kemp Land Co Inc | Rohwer, AR 71666 | $195,615 |
| 20 | Gold Creek Land Company LLC | Hope, AR 71801 | $183,645 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf