Total Commodity Programs in Greene County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,823
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Greene County, Arkansas totaled $397,209,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First National Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72451 | $6,701,978 |
| 2 | Graham Farms | Marmaduke, AR 72443 | $6,430,217 |
| 3 | King Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $6,278,719 |
| 4 | Boyd Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $4,667,986 |
| 5 | Bancorp South Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72450 | $3,797,939 |
| 6 | Yates Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $3,767,390 |
| 7 | Tymac Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $3,707,257 |
| 8 | Gray Farms Ptr | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $3,368,815 |
| 9 | Promise Land Farms | Paragould, AR 72450 | $2,920,635 |
| 10 | Leonard & Steve Wall Farms Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $2,888,065 |
| 11 | Martin Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $2,742,531 |
| 12 | Tritch Bros Farms Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $2,411,644 |
| 13 | Hall Farming Company Ptr Prior To | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $2,295,745 |
| 14 | Gng Farms Ptr | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $2,193,912 |
| 15 | Norwood Farms Partnership | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $2,169,025 |
| 16 | Ksg Farms Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $2,152,160 |
| 17 | Henson Brothers Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $2,069,962 |
| 18 | Joseph Plantation | Paragould, AR 72451 | $1,964,967 |
| 19 | Hufford Farms Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $1,930,465 |
| 20 | Randy M Russom | Beech Grove, AR 72412 | $1,897,941 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf