Direct Payment Program in Izard County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 70
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Izard County, Arkansas totaled $518,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Miller Poultry And Cattle Inc | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $109,323 |
2 | Union Cattle Company | Salem, AR 72576 | $58,344 |
3 | Hayden C Phillips | Franklin, AR 72536 | $26,173 |
4 | Piney Wood Farms Limited Partners | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $25,606 |
5 | Randall S Wortham | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $21,873 |
6 | Donald Tate | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $20,019 |
7 | Albert E Smith | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $17,293 |
8 | Bennie Cooper | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $16,874 |
9 | Charles Yancey | Horseshoe Bend, AR 72512 | $14,738 |
10 | Charles Washington | Brockwell, AR 72517 | $14,689 |
11 | Marie Collie | Mountain Home, AR 72653 | $14,233 |
12 | Shirley Killian Leach | Mountain Home, AR 72653 | $13,695 |
13 | Joe M Washington | Wideman, AR 72585 | $11,982 |
14 | Steve Jones | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $10,803 |
15 | Margaret Parker | Ash Flat, AR 72513 | $10,204 |
16 | Lester Gross | Franklin, AR 72536 | $10,164 |
17 | Danny K Wortham | Sage, AR 72573 | $9,943 |
18 | D R Edwards | Mount Pleasant, AR 72561 | $9,360 |
19 | Don Edwards | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $8,639 |
20 | Jimmy Mitchell | Pineville, AR 72566 | $8,628 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>