Farm Subsidy information
Jackson County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Jackson County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,108
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jackson County, Arkansas totaled $671,623,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Bell Brothers Ptnrs | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,286,647 |
| 22 | Nick Jackson Partnership | Amagon, AR 72005 | $2,224,239 |
| 23 | Crandall Farms | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $2,084,121 |
| 24 | A-jac Farms Inc | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $2,054,784 |
| 25 | Dion Sutherland Ptnr | Grubbs, AR 72431 | $2,046,374 |
| 26 | Jerry Burgess | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $2,041,044 |
| 27 | Taylor & Taylor Ptnr | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,018,771 |
| 28 | Walker Planting Company | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,985,019 |
| 29 | Diversified Agri Partnership | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $1,978,809 |
| 30 | Prairie City Farm | Harrisburg, AR 72432 | $1,942,157 |
| 31 | Mann Bros Farm Ptnrs | Hickory Ridge, AR 72347 | $1,934,108 |
| 32 | Mcgaughey Bros Inc | Fayetteville, AR 72703 | $1,930,201 |
| 33 | Griffin-lawrence Partnership | Waldenburg, AR 72475 | $1,847,605 |
| 34 | Sambezo Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,838,493 |
| 35 | Young Bros Partners | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $1,837,532 |
| 36 | Snmb Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,816,988 |
| 37 | 7-11 Farm Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $1,682,200 |
| 38 | F L Penix & Sons Inc | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $1,667,553 |
| 39 | H & H Planting Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,641,875 |
| 40 | Talmage Whitehead & Talmage Whitehead Jr Ptr | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,621,422 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf