Direct Payment Program in Jackson County, Arkansas, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,783

Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Jackson County, Arkansas totaled $137,876,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Direct Payment Program
1995-2021
1Eagle Lake Farm PartnershipNewport, AR 72112$2,629,739
2Bowman Farms PtnrNewport, AR 72112$2,171,585
3Dennis And Malcolm Haigwood A PartnershipNewport, AR 72112$2,012,045
4H & J Land CompanyNewport, AR 72112$1,881,052
5Swifton Farms PtnrsSwifton, AR 72471$1,743,377
6Tupelo Planting CoTupelo, AR 72169$1,687,133
7Rutledge & Rutledge PartnershipNewport, AR 72112$1,567,214
8Cache River Farms PtnrsNewport, AR 72112$1,399,099
9Sutherland Farms PtnrsGrubbs, AR 72431$1,326,485
10B & G AgriNewport, AR 72112$1,311,062
11Generation Three PartnershipTuckerman, AR 72473$1,281,831
12Diversified Agri PartnershipTuckerman, AR 72473$1,261,518
13Walker Planting CompanyNewport, AR 72112$1,043,993
14Shumate Family PartnershipNewport, AR 72112$1,000,461
15Snyder Bros PtnrsNewport, AR 72112$970,170
16Winemiller Farms PtnrSwifton, AR 72471$852,826
17Cowlake Farms PtnrsHickory Ridge, AR 72347$826,969
18Huey Farms PartnershipNewport, AR 72112$822,165
19Nick Jackson PartnershipAmagon, AR 72005$801,530
20Dion Sutherland PtnrGrubbs, AR 72431$765,482

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag