Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Jackson County, Arkansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 498
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Jackson County, Arkansas totaled $10,930,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Merchants & Planters Bank ** | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,736,347 |
2 | Generation Three Partnership | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $596,599 |
3 | Dennis And Malcolm Haigwood A Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $569,215 |
4 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $488,329 |
5 | Agheritage ** | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $359,350 |
6 | D I D Farms Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $219,940 |
7 | H & J Land Company | Newport, AR 72112 | $214,251 |
8 | Bell Brothers Ptnrs | Newport, AR 72112 | $185,793 |
9 | Swifton Farms Ptnrs | Swifton, AR 72471 | $172,843 |
10 | Tupelo Planting Co | Tupelo, AR 72169 | $159,159 |
11 | Eagle Lake Farm Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $143,564 |
12 | Rutledge & Rutledge Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $115,501 |
13 | Southbound Farm Partners | Paris, MO 65275 | $111,388 |
14 | K K Farms Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $94,560 |
15 | Michael Wood Farms Inc | Tupelo, AR 72169 | $90,950 |
16 | A E Shoffner Ltd | Newport, AR 72112 | $90,945 |
17 | James D Hutchinson Jr | Newport, AR 72112 | $85,933 |
18 | Julia Brand | Newport, AR 72112 | $84,175 |
19 | Wkw Farms | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $79,975 |
20 | Barbara Graham | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $78,961 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>