Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Lawrence County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 616
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Lawrence County, Arkansas totaled $14,198,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ninety-one Farms | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $111,395 |
22 | Scott Durham Partnership | Cave City, AR 72521 | $107,329 |
23 | Arnold Family Farm LLC | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $102,997 |
24 | Steve Graddy | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $101,649 |
25 | Britt Jones Inc | Hoxie, AR 72433 | $98,540 |
26 | Bonner-tinsley Farms Inc | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $97,918 |
27 | Gary Gill | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $97,303 |
28 | Cox Cox & Stone Partnership | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $96,625 |
29 | Rickey W Huskey | Strawberry, AR 72469 | $95,619 |
30 | Jerry Morgan Jr | Lynn, AR 72440 | $93,763 |
31 | Charlie Farms Inc | Minturn, AR 72445 | $91,198 |
32 | Clover Bend Rice Company | Paragould, AR 72450 | $91,123 |
33 | Jca Farms Ptr | Hoxie, AR 72433 | $90,608 |
34 | Saffell Farms | Saffell, AR 72572 | $90,602 |
35 | Saw Farms Inc | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $90,123 |
36 | Nea Farms Inc | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $87,899 |
37 | Hibbard Farms Partnership | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $87,623 |
38 | Luke Gill Farms Inc | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $84,191 |
39 | Highway 91 Farms LLC | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $82,980 |
40 | Rolling Farms LLC | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $82,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”