Farm Subsidy information
Lincoln County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Lincoln County, Arkansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 518
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lincoln County, Arkansas totaled $18,653,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Relyance Bank ** | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $1,549,617 |
| 2 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $1,014,660 |
| 3 | Merchants & Planters Bank ** | Newport, AR 72112 | $821,857 |
| 4 | Bank Of Star City ** | Star City, AR 71667 | $457,940 |
| 5 | Jack B Jackson & Sons Ptrsp | Star City, AR 71667 | $414,922 |
| 6 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $389,687 |
| 7 | Delta Production Credit Assn ** | Dermott, AR 71638 | $336,743 |
| 8 | Grady Farming Co | Grady, AR 71644 | $302,994 |
| 9 | Kenny Price Farming Co | Gould, AR 71643 | $301,699 |
| 10 | Eifling Farms | Grady, AR 71644 | $300,959 |
| 11 | G & P Farm Partnership | Grady, AR 71644 | $280,166 |
| 12 | Rjr Farms | Grady, AR 71644 | $255,530 |
| 13 | G & L Gasaway Farms | Gould, AR 71643 | $249,574 |
| 14 | D E & K Farms Ptrsp | Grady, AR 71644 | $243,478 |
| 15 | Mcgraw Farms | Gould, AR 71643 | $234,678 |
| 16 | Goodgame Farms | Dumas, AR 71639 | $220,840 |
| 17 | Jesse Rice | Gould, AR 71643 | $220,187 |
| 18 | Rambin Family Farms | Grady, AR 71644 | $214,871 |
| 19 | D & D Farms Partnership | Dumas, AR 71639 | $206,051 |
| 20 | Randy Hardin Farms Inc | Grady, AR 71644 | $205,953 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf