Farm Subsidy information
Logan County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Logan County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,099
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Logan County, Arkansas totaled $25,150,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schluterman Farms Incorporated | Paris, AR 72855 | $1,156,582 |
| 2 | Preston Farms LLC | Booneville, AR 72927 | $1,047,484 |
| 3 | Komp Farms | Subiaco, AR 72865 | $894,148 |
| 4 | Komp Farms LLC | Subiaco, AR 72865 | $725,549 |
| 5 | Brett Foster Cattle Company Inc | Booneville, AR 72927 | $535,454 |
| 6 | Hixson Farms Paris Inc | Paris, AR 72855 | $524,412 |
| 7 | J & P Willems Farms LLC | Paris, AR 72855 | $520,123 |
| 8 | Komp Brothers Farms LLC | Paris, AR 72855 | $489,247 |
| 9 | Kenneth Corley | Booneville, AR 72927 | $402,739 |
| 10 | James C Hixson | Paris, AR 72855 | $355,612 |
| 11 | James Whitaker | Booneville, AR 72927 | $276,995 |
| 12 | H L Hembree | Ozark, AR 72949 | $254,517 |
| 13 | Johnny Balkman | Magazine, AR 72943 | $248,816 |
| 14 | Michael B Schluterman | Paris, AR 72855 | $239,120 |
| 15 | Kenneth Schluterman | Paris, AR 72855 | $237,795 |
| 16 | Keith Willems | Subiaco, AR 72865 | $224,228 |
| 17 | Eberhart J Willems | Paris, AR 72855 | $187,395 |
| 18 | Ouida Ann Whitaker | Booneville, AR 72927 | $161,051 |
| 19 | Ronnie Koch | Paris, AR 72855 | $154,906 |
| 20 | Charles Kit Parker | Booneville, AR 72927 | $146,040 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf