Total Conservation Programs in Lonoke County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 726
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Lonoke County, Arkansas totaled $24,531,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Twist Farm And Timber Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $1,482,248 |
2 | Brantley Farming Co | England, AR 72046 | $508,527 |
3 | Dorothy Nelon Davis Trust | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $491,703 |
4 | James Robert Mccallie | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $397,959 |
5 | Finley Bros & Sons | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $376,433 |
6 | Keo Fish Farm Inc | Keo, AR 72083 | $349,503 |
7 | G & M Bennett Farms | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $331,120 |
8 | Bobby Cloninger Farms | England, AR 72046 | $296,307 |
9 | Taylor Farms | Liberty, MS 39645 | $293,140 |
10 | Young Farms Inc | Little Rock, AR 72223 | $289,103 |
11 | James C East | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $286,418 |
12 | Grc Properties Limited Ptship I | England, AR 72046 | $259,855 |
13 | Porter R Rodgers Jr | Searcy, AR 72145 | $259,632 |
14 | Carl Dean Madar Revocable Trust | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $247,000 |
15 | Paula Rail | England, AR 72046 | $246,552 |
16 | Mazzanti-earl Farm | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $235,487 |
17 | Allen Ray Duck | England, AR 72046 | $224,966 |
18 | D K Bennett Farms Ltd Ptshp Lllp | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $220,348 |
19 | Boyer Trust | Searcy, AR 72143 | $205,685 |
20 | Robert G Bevis | Scott, AR 72142 | $204,896 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>