Farm Subsidy information
Miller County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Miller County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 848
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Miller County, Arkansas totaled $152,034,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | C & P Farm Partnership | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $1,017,170 |
22 | Dean Farms Texarkana | Texarkana, TX 75504 | $951,390 |
23 | Jasper Stover | Texarkana, TX 75503 | $920,838 |
24 | Jack & Sandy Dougan Farms | Emmet, AR 71835 | $880,540 |
25 | Arklatex Farms Inc | Ida, LA 71044 | $857,162 |
26 | Michael L Lowe | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $824,298 |
27 | C L Farms | Garland City, AR 71839 | $819,665 |
28 | Dean Farms Inc | Texarkana, TX 75504 | $813,881 |
29 | Heigle Farms | Doddridge, AR 71834 | $723,488 |
30 | Jimmy L Cullipher | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $671,824 |
31 | Lonnie Lenth | De Kalb, TX 75559 | $659,139 |
32 | Humphrey Farms | Fouke, AR 71837 | $653,777 |
33 | Steve Cullipher Farms Inc | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $642,896 |
34 | Wren Land & Cattle Company Inc | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $640,449 |
35 | B & L Farms | Fouke, AR 71837 | $640,394 |
36 | West Line Farms | Paragould, AR 72450 | $626,586 |
37 | Charles E Cullipher | Garland City, AR 71839 | $625,679 |
38 | West Line Investments LLC | Paragould, AR 72450 | $612,419 |
39 | A Lynn Lowe | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $602,010 |
40 | H & H Farms | Fouke, AR 71837 | $588,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”