Total Conservation Programs in Monroe County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 278
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Monroe County, Arkansas totaled $6,133,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dean Family Farm Limited Partnerhsip | North Little Rock, AR 72116 | $393,018 |
2 | Wiley Meacham | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $290,555 |
3 | Curtis-curtis And Vi Floyd Crisp | Elaine, AR 72333 | $279,816 |
4 | Kathleen Lee | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $239,570 |
5 | Vernon Hartsfield | Elaine, AR 72333 | $216,912 |
6 | Snelson Farms LLC | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $185,021 |
7 | Reid Grizzle | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $158,641 |
8 | James B Sharp | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $113,129 |
9 | Steve Meacham | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $112,039 |
10 | Davis Farm | Roe, AR 72134 | $102,536 |
11 | Curtis Floyd Crisp-curtis And Vicky Crisp Revocabl | Elaine, AR 72333 | $101,767 |
12 | Robert Brown Farms LLC | Lawrenceville, GA 30043 | $96,560 |
13 | Kirby Meacham Farm | Clarendon, AR 72029 | $90,129 |
14 | Travis Lee | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $87,222 |
15 | Scott Griffith Partnership Lp | Holly Grove, AR 72069 | $87,184 |
16 | Albert Grizzle | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $86,544 |
17 | Beard Farm Inc | New Orleans, LA 70179 | $86,180 |
18 | Grizzle Bros Inc | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $81,491 |
19 | Geisler Family LLC | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $80,527 |
20 | W W Bateman Farms | Sardis, MS 38666 | $74,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>