Loan Deficiency in Poinsett County, Arkansas, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,734

Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Poinsett County, Arkansas totaled $69,506,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Loan Deficiency
1995-2021
1Benwood FarmsEarle, AR 72331$1,450,996
2Sunshine Farms A PartnerhshipHarrisburg, AR 72432$1,346,329
3Ziegenhorn Seed Farms PartnershipFisher, AR 72429$1,175,212
4Willoughby Farms PartnershipMarked Tree, AR 72365$824,268
5Ashton Farms A PartnershipHarrisburg, AR 72432$800,525
6Morrisett FarmsMarked Tree, AR 72365$745,341
7Massengill FarmsHarrisburg, AR 72432$737,957
8Re-lo Farms A PartnershipCherry Valley, AR 72324$737,007
9Walls & Walls A PartnershipHarrisburg, AR 72432$712,697
10S & C Osment PartnershipTrumann, AR 72472$695,710
11Swift Ditch Farms PartnershipTrumann, AR 72472$677,392
12ValcoEarle, AR 72331$646,412
13Stuckey Farms CompanyClarkedale, AR 72325$630,028
14Pohlner Farms PartnershipFisher, AR 72429$623,872
15Neal & Neal Farms A PartnershipMarked Tree, AR 72365$620,511
16Crouch & Crouch Farms PartnershipHarrisburg, AR 72432$570,064
17Lawson Farms A PartnershipHarrisburg, AR 72432$505,906
18Terry Farms A PartnershipJonesboro, AR 72404$495,401
19Ryan Brothers PartnershipLepanto, AR 72354$439,856
20Murphy Farms A PartnershipHarrisburg, AR 72432$431,646

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag