Total Commodity Programs in Saint Francis County, Arkansas, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,924

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Francis County, Arkansas totaled $357,996,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Trail PartnershipWidener, AR 72394$10,184,135
2J T Jarrett & SonsColt, AR 72326$5,627,474
3Fnb Of Eastern Arkansas **Forrest City, AR 72335$5,419,201
4Jessland PlantationForrest City, AR 72335$5,260,263
5Heritage Farms A General PartnersForrest City, AR 72336$4,265,573
6Melvin Farms PartnershipHunter, AR 72074$4,074,630
7Fogg FarmsHeth, AR 72346$3,956,376
8David Fowler Farms A PartnershipWheatley, AR 72392$3,900,400
9Whittenton Farms PartnershipForrest City, AR 72335$3,843,640
10Wayne Loewer FarmsBrinkley, AR 72021$3,748,912
11D & D Gore FarmPalestine, AR 72372$3,624,379
12Mcdaniel FarmsForrest City, AR 72335$3,603,880
13Norsworthy PartnershipWidener, AR 72394$3,023,690
14B & C Howton FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$3,015,010
15Jumper PartnershipPalestine, AR 72372$2,925,377
16Weeks FarmWidener, AR 72394$2,903,069
17Henry Dale Jayroe FarmsPalestine, AR 72372$2,811,194
18Cottonwood PartnershipBrickeys, AR 72320$2,709,711
19Williams FarmsVilonia, AR 72173$2,704,736
20B & G Farm PartnershipHeth, AR 72346$2,657,167

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag