Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 412
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in California totaled $1,122,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | E W Merritt Farms | Porterville, CA 93257 | $48,731 |
2 | F M Upton & Sons Dba Lost Wagon W | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $39,508 |
3 | Buttonwillow Land And Cattle Co | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $24,226 |
4 | Conservation Farms And Ranches | Walnut Grove, CA 95690 | $22,560 |
5 | Payne Farms | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $21,763 |
6 | Manzanillo Ranch | Hanford, CA 93230 | $20,864 |
7 | Edward A & Ian Anderson | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $20,068 |
8 | Freese Ranch | Birds Landing, CA 94512 | $16,415 |
9 | Hamilton Brothers | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $16,161 |
10 | Joe Yeung Farms Inc | West Sacramento, CA 95691 | $15,943 |
11 | Mark Esperson | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $14,580 |
12 | Newton Farms | Stratford, CA 93266 | $13,878 |
13 | Ben Carreiro & Sons | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $13,697 |
14 | Knob Hill Mines Inc | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $13,528 |
15 | Diffenbaugh Farming | Lost Hills, CA 93249 | $13,267 |
16 | Joseph & Judi Freitas J V | Hanford, CA 93230 | $12,251 |
17 | Mccormack Sheep & Grain | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $11,474 |
18 | Westside Farms | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $11,416 |
19 | Jg Avila Farms | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $11,376 |
20 | Robinson Ranch | Merced, CA 95348 | $11,078 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>