Oilseed Program in California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,570
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in California totaled $3,055,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J G Boswell Co | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $139,810 |
| 2 | Los Rios Farms Inc | Davis, CA 95617 | $66,428 |
| 3 | River Garden Farms Company | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $49,738 |
| 4 | Reclaimed Island Lands Company | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $38,673 |
| 5 | Gregory Schmid | Davis, CA 95617 | $32,530 |
| 6 | Ashley Payne Revocable Trust Date | Knights Landing, CA 95645 | $28,502 |
| 7 | Buttonwillow Land And Cattle Co | Buttonwillow, CA 93206 | $26,845 |
| 8 | George Aoki Farms Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $26,588 |
| 9 | Dan Best Ranch Inc | Woodland, CA 95776 | $22,689 |
| 10 | Myers Seed | Colusa, CA 95932 | $22,337 |
| 11 | Jack Klein Trust Ptrshp | Stockton, CA 95267 | $21,495 |
| 12 | Hansen Ranches | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $21,408 |
| 13 | Eastman Ranch | Woodland, CA 95776 | $21,022 |
| 14 | Slater Farms Inc | Clarksburg, CA 95612 | $20,971 |
| 15 | Knob Hill Mines Inc | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $20,347 |
| 16 | M & J Farms | Meridian, CA 95957 | $19,511 |
| 17 | Sarale Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95206 | $19,072 |
| 18 | Berniece L Silva | Stockton, CA 95203 | $18,188 |
| 19 | Mccormack Farms | El Macero, CA 95618 | $16,964 |
| 20 | Frye-giampaoli Farms Inc | Sutter, CA 95982 | $16,838 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf