SELECT * FROM st_mtotal WHERE fips='06000' AND progcode='rice ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Rice Subsidies in California, 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 8,351

Recipients of Rice Subsidies from farms in California totaled $2,811,000,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Rice Subsidies
1995-2020
1Farmers Rice CoopSacramento, CA 95851$146,174,297
2R Gorrill Ranch Enterprises *Durham, CA 95938$13,080,001
3E Franklin Larrabee & Assoc *Chico, CA 95926$9,321,378
4Canal Farms *Maxwell, CA 95955$8,620,453
5Colusa Indian Community Council *Colusa, CA 95932$8,432,921
6S B & L La Grande *Williams, CA 95987$7,790,237
7Arnold Hoffart Mark Hoffart & Nei *Robbins, CA 95676$7,297,189
8Chrisman Farms *Williams, CA 95987$6,705,649
9Resource Group *Richvale, CA 95974$6,628,187
10Southam Joint Venture *Butte City, CA 95920$6,484,035
11Sjv Enterprises *Nicolaus, CA 95659$6,395,532
12Knight Farms *Glenn, CA 95943$6,311,963
13Tres Picos *Redding, CA 96099$6,187,997
14Valley Farms *Live Oak, CA 95953$6,185,121
15Eastman Ranch *Woodland, CA 95776$5,948,745
16K-four Farms *Yuba City, CA 95993$5,937,786
17Boeger Land Company *Gridley, CA 95948$5,623,692
18Van Dyke Brothers *Pleasant Grove, CA 95668$5,620,753
19K & R Farming *Fort Bragg, CA 95437$5,551,364
20Perez & Perez Family Farms *Glenn, CA 95943$5,459,487

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag