SELECT * FROM st_mtotal WHERE fips='06000' AND progcode='total_acre' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in California, 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 322

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in California totaled $14,697,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2020
1Dhr Century Farming *Chico, CA 95928$385,145
2Valley West Partners *Robbins, CA 95676$358,338
3Tres Picos *Redding, CA 96099$340,728
4Biggs Farming Group *Biggs, CA 95917$310,272
5Feather Butte Farms *Gridley, CA 95948$269,616
6Southam Joint Venture *Butte City, CA 95920$261,872
7Sean V Doherty Farms *Dunnigan, CA 95937$248,394
8Gallagher Farms *Rio Oso, CA 95674$241,704
9Montna Farms, A Community Propert *Yuba City, CA 95991$230,522
10Three Brothers - 3 Brothers *Chico, CA 95973$214,943
11Eager Christiansen & Rue *Rio Oso, CA 95674$202,499
12Charles Sheppard Farms *Biggs, CA 95917$196,491
13Rue Ranch Partnership *Rio Oso, CA 95674$173,936
14Trevethan Farms *Pleasant Grove, CA 95668$155,964
15Rancho Esquon Inc *Concord, CA 94522$155,138
16John And Erin Brennan Partnership *Woodland, CA 95695$148,888
17Michael V And Kirsten K Doherty RDunnigan, CA 95937$132,909
18A & M Farms *Chico, CA 95928$132,618
19Circle S Ranch *Nicolaus, CA 95659$128,896
20John De Groot & Son *Fresno, CA 93706$128,689

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag