Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 8,430
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in California totaled $91,422,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard L Hewitson | Avenal, CA 93204 | $111,868 |
22 | Susen Hewitson | Avenal, CA 93204 | $111,868 |
23 | James S Anderson | Coalinga, CA 93210 | $106,713 |
24 | Fred A Douma Dairy Partnership | Tracy, CA 95304 | $103,708 |
25 | Duane Martin Livestock | Ione, CA 95640 | $103,567 |
26 | Beverly Tobias | Tres Pinos, CA 95075 | $101,597 |
27 | Nino Ranch LLC | King City, CA 93930 | $101,281 |
28 | John De Groot & Son | Fresno, CA 93706 | $101,003 |
29 | Five Dot Land & Cattle Co | Standish, CA 96128 | $100,000 |
30 | Dykstra Family Dairy | Fallon, NV 89406 | $99,675 |
31 | Amador Zabalbeascoa | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $98,985 |
32 | Walter Stornetta Ranch | Manchester, CA 95459 | $96,401 |
33 | James R Chance | Ballico, CA 95303 | $96,365 |
34 | Judith K Chance | Ballico, CA 95303 | $96,365 |
35 | Coastal Cattle Company LLC | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $94,437 |
36 | Dan & Joye Forbes Living Trust | Piedra, CA 93649 | $94,050 |
37 | Martin Emigh | Dixon, CA 95620 | $93,484 |
38 | Wm M Urrutia | Friant, CA 93626 | $93,412 |
39 | Raymond F Christie | Arcata, CA 95521 | $93,379 |
40 | Cathie Twisselman | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $93,135 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”