CCC Organic Programs in California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 41
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in California totaled $30,344 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $1,611 |
| 2 | Jlt Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $1,513 |
| 3 | Mcclure Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $1,325 |
| 4 | John A Mattos Jr | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,259 |
| 5 | E & M Deniz Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $1,250 |
| 6 | Seus Family Farms Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $1,081 |
| 7 | Ronald E Wilson Dba Diamond W Dairy Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,070 |
| 8 | Nativa Yerbamate Inc. | Long Beach, CA 90814 | $1,020 |
| 9 | Arrowhead Co | Colusa, CA 95932 | $1,000 |
| 10 | Angel Lin Lopez Jr | Smith River, CA 95567 | $1,000 |
| 11 | Shanley Farms Inc | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $900 |
| 12 | Woodville Ranches LLC | Visalia, CA 93291 | $875 |
| 13 | Shasta Seed Farm | Merrill, OR 97633 | $875 |
| 14 | Hughes Dairy | Bodega, CA 94922 | $832 |
| 15 | Kaley Elena Grimland | King City, CA 93930 | $788 |
| 16 | Jose A Serrano | Royal Oaks, CA 95076 | $750 |
| 17 | Kezirian Family Living Trust | Fresno, CA 93723 | $750 |
| 18 | Thad Johnson | Malin, OR 97632 | $725 |
| 19 | Tally Ho Farms Partnership Dba Walker Brothers | Merrill, OR 97633 | $725 |
| 20 | Natures Best Farms Inc | Yorba Linda, CA 92886 | $678 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf