Wetlands Reserve Program in California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Wetlands Reserve Program from farms in California totaled $2,139,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wetlands Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rodney W Williams II | Greenwood, CA 95635 | $27,500 |
22 | Darrell Wood/petes Valley | Susanville, CA 96130 | $26,722 |
23 | San Joaquin Wetland Farms | San Carlos, CA 94070 | $23,602 |
24 | John K Baker | Oakland, CA 94602 | $22,328 |
25 | James J Stevinson Corp | Newman, CA 95360 | $20,902 |
26 | David L Ciapponi | Alamo, CA 94507 | $20,000 |
27 | Hall-mark Services Inc | Sacramento, CA 95819 | $19,250 |
28 | Richard Burtleson | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $18,093 |
29 | Diversified Development Group | Fresno, CA 93704 | $18,000 |
30 | Mattie Z Keeley | Colusa, CA 95932 | $17,917 |
31 | County Of Trinity | Weaverville, CA 96093 | $17,499 |
32 | Rancho Rio Oso | Browns Valley, CA 95918 | $17,000 |
33 | Coastal San Luis Rcd | Morro Bay, CA 93442 | $14,407 |
34 | Peter G Pfendler Trust | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $13,618 |
35 | State Of California Dept Of Parks | Columbia, CA 95310 | $12,900 |
36 | California Farms II | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $12,700 |
37 | Foundation Beaulieu Inc | Hollister, CA 95024 | $9,638 |
38 | Kerry-su Properties | San Leandro, CA 94577 | $9,410 |
39 | Greg Amaral Ltd Pension Plan & Tr | Fairfield, CA 94534 | $9,256 |
40 | Bob Munsey | Cameron Park, CA 95682 | $8,250 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”