Total Conservation Programs in California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 171
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in California totaled $2,485,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Mitch Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $37,954 |
| 22 | Kelly Miller Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $37,942 |
| 23 | Stacy Miller Bonnifield | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $37,942 |
| 24 | Marshall Arnold LLC | Colusa, CA 95932 | $37,364 |
| 25 | Rex Houghton | Montague, CA 96064 | $36,737 |
| 26 | Ernst Family Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $35,501 |
| 27 | C R Grant Ranch LLC | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $34,466 |
| 28 | L R Martin Inc | Madera, CA 93636 | $33,548 |
| 29 | Ponderosa Farms, Lp | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $33,314 |
| 30 | Work Family Estate Trust | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $33,052 |
| 31 | Raymond O Dauth 2014 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93446 | $31,336 |
| 32 | G R Rhyne And Linda L Rhyne 1997 Revocable Trust | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $31,336 |
| 33 | Carly Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $30,663 |
| 34 | Garrett Roth | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $30,663 |
| 35 | Robert A Grant Jr Trust Dated Nov 5 2004 | Shandon, CA 93461 | $30,576 |
| 36 | Nigel Macrae | Las Vegas, NV 89130 | $30,542 |
| 37 | Yosemite Farm Credit ** | Turlock, CA 95381 | $29,846 |
| 38 | Jaureguy Land Trust Dated December 29 1995 | San Miguel, CA 93451 | $29,708 |
| 39 | Mark Morrison | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $28,207 |
| 40 | Donald E Furtado | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $25,391 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf