Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Butte County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 104
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Butte County, California totaled $2,950,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dhr Century Farming | Chico, CA 95928 | $225,196 |
2 | Bianchi Partnership | Durham, CA 95938 | $219,283 |
3 | Tres Picos | Redding, CA 96099 | $117,905 |
4 | William R Pritchard Family Ltd Ptshp | Davis, CA 95616 | $116,500 |
5 | Thompson Farms Lp | Chico, CA 95973 | $116,500 |
6 | Melbay Farms | Yuba City, CA 95992 | $104,480 |
7 | Jcm Equipment Leasing, Inc. | Sacramento, CA 95833 | $99,727 |
8 | Feather Butte Farms | Gridley, CA 95948 | $98,308 |
9 | Nichols Ranch Partnership | Chico, CA 95928 | $90,065 |
10 | Minasian Minasian Trust Minasian Ptshp | Oroville, CA 95965 | $85,899 |
11 | Davit Dayton LLC | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $79,813 |
12 | Meyer Ranch Partners, LLC | Gridley, CA 95948 | $71,502 |
13 | John Shuler | Healdsburg, CA 95448 | $68,314 |
14 | Tom & Sally B Donati | Oroville, CA 95965 | $59,456 |
15 | Blue Gum Ranch | Davis, CA 95616 | $56,949 |
16 | Walter K Meyer | Biggs, CA 95917 | $54,728 |
17 | Jan Meyer | Biggs, CA 95917 | $54,728 |
18 | Garrett J Meyer | Biggs, CA 95917 | $51,906 |
19 | G & L Farms | Richvale, CA 95974 | $46,389 |
20 | Kelleher Family Farms LLC | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $43,450 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>