Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Butte County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Butte County, California totaled $198,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | West Chico Properties Dba Hula Nut Company | Biggs, CA 95917 | $41,192 |
| 2 | Five Star Ranches | Biggs, CA 95917 | $34,416 |
| 3 | Lavy Brothers | Biggs, CA 95917 | $33,683 |
| 4 | Water Grass Flats Joint Venture | Chico, CA 95928 | $31,598 |
| 5 | Minasian Minasian Trust Minasian Ptshp | Oroville, CA 95965 | $19,361 |
| 6 | Dos Rios Land Co | Biggs, CA 95917 | $9,748 |
| 7 | Harris Landowning Corp | Richvale, CA 95974 | $6,693 |
| 8 | Fjr Farms | Yuba City, CA 95991 | $4,745 |
| 9 | Roseville Land Development Association Inc | Roseville, CA 95747 | $4,423 |
| 10 | Stolp Lands Inc | Durham, CA 95938 | $3,735 |
| 11 | Jr-t1 | Biggs, CA 95917 | $2,067 |
| 12 | Indian Hill Land Co | Gridley, CA 95948 | $2,004 |
| 13 | Melba T Bailey Irrevocable Trust | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $1,867 |
| 14 | R Gorrill Ranch Enterprises | Durham, CA 95938 | $1,049 |
| 15 | Teresa Garcia | Biggs, CA 95917 | $899 |
| 16 | Sohnrey Daughters Irrevocable Trust | Glenn, CA 95943 | $292 |
| 17 | Mary Van Gilder - Van Gilder Family Revocable Trus | Oroville, CA 95965 | $279 |
| 18 | Thompson Farms Lp | Chico, CA 95973 | $0 |
| 19 | Sohnrey And Son Family Farm | Durham, CA 95938 | $0 |
| 20 | Pine Creek Ranch | Durham, CA 95938 | $0 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf