Farm Subsidy information
Calaveras County, California
Total Subsidies in Calaveras County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 346
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calaveras County, California totaled $11,919,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | John V Tiscornia | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $472,044 |
2 | Steven Wooster | Copperopolis, CA 95228 | $356,502 |
3 | Douglas H Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $334,655 |
4 | Eloise Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $300,434 |
5 | Walter Valente Jr | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $287,029 |
6 | Stan Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $286,474 |
7 | Matt Fischer | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $263,444 |
8 | Merle Fischer | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $237,881 |
9 | Elliott Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $229,755 |
10 | Russell Stephens | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $224,661 |
11 | Whittle Ranch Inc | Altaville, CA 95221 | $205,021 |
12 | John Davies | Avery, CA 95224 | $191,502 |
13 | Leroy Rader | San Andreas, CA 95249 | $190,687 |
14 | Lewallen Land & Cattle Co | Linden, CA 95236 | $190,415 |
15 | Tom Tryon | Angels Camp, CA 95222 | $175,519 |
16 | W C Potter & Son Inc | Linden, CA 95236 | $167,429 |
17 | Garamendi Exemption Trust | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $165,674 |
18 | Donald R Whittle Jr | Altaville, CA 95221 | $160,441 |
19 | Michael D Fischer Jr | Valley Springs, CA 95252 | $149,118 |
20 | J W Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $147,327 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>