Loan Deficiency in Contra Costa County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Contra Costa County, California totaled $932,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Delta Wetlands Properties | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | $423,423 |
| 2 | Palm Tract Farms | Byron, CA 94505 | $117,635 |
| 3 | Rankins Ag Inc | Tracy, CA 95391 | $69,495 |
| 4 | Cecchini & Cecchini Inc | Discovery Bay, CA 94505 | $42,765 |
| 5 | Coleman Foley Jr | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | $42,380 |
| 6 | Greg Torlai | Holt, CA 95234 | $37,928 |
| 7 | Russell J Jackson Deceased | Livermore, CA 94551 | $36,628 |
| 8 | A Marie Jackson | Livermore, CA 94551 | $33,064 |
| 9 | Rbc Orwood Inc | Discovery Bay, CA 94505 | $27,682 |
| 10 | A Marie Jackson | Livermore, CA 94550 | $16,390 |
| 11 | Selso Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $15,620 |
| 12 | Juana Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $15,161 |
| 13 | Jaime Rodriguez Jr | Isleton, CA 95641 | $15,161 |
| 14 | Peter Swanson | Tracy, CA 95377 | $7,746 |
| 15 | Torlai Farms Inc | Holt, CA 95234 | $6,512 |
| 16 | Philip Martin | Tracy, CA 95304 | $3,953 |
| 17 | Mnm Farms Inc | Stockton, CA 95206 | $3,354 |
| 18 | Lawrence De Borba | Byron, CA 94514 | $3,329 |
| 19 | Ellis Island Farms Inc | San Francisco, CA 94111 | $3,187 |
| 20 | Laura Torlai | Holt, CA 95234 | $2,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf