Production Flexibility Program in Contra Costa County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 59
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Contra Costa County, California totaled $1,802,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rankins Ag Inc | Tracy, CA 95391 | $231,370 |
2 | Palm Tract Farms | Byron, CA 94505 | $213,320 |
3 | Marc Frelier | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $142,429 |
4 | Russell J Jackson Deceased | Livermore, CA 94551 | $122,963 |
5 | A Marie Jackson | Livermore, CA 94550 | $122,963 |
6 | John Ramos | Patterson, CA 95363 | $99,367 |
7 | Selso Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $89,841 |
8 | Juana Rodriguez | Isleton, CA 95641 | $88,651 |
9 | Ronald Nunn | Brentwood, CA 94513 | $88,348 |
10 | Cecchini & Cecchini Inc | Discovery Bay, CA 94505 | $78,856 |
11 | Delta Wetlands Properties | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | $69,721 |
12 | Jaime Rodriguez Jr | Isleton, CA 95641 | $62,902 |
13 | Bear State Estates | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | $47,680 |
14 | Greg Torlai | Holt, CA 95234 | $35,842 |
15 | Coleman Foley Jr | Pleasanton, CA 94566 | $34,473 |
16 | Lawrence De Borba | Byron, CA 94514 | $33,964 |
17 | Han Yang International Corp | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | $28,982 |
18 | Rbc Orwood Inc | Discovery Bay, CA 94505 | $28,315 |
19 | D & P Family Limited Partnership | Tracy, CA 95377 | $27,779 |
20 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $20,230 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>