Farm Subsidy information
Del Norte County, California
Total Subsidies in Del Norte County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 67
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Del Norte County, California totaled $2,773,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Palmer Westbrook Inc | Smith River, CA 95567 | $335,817 |
2 | Dahlstrom & Watt Bulb Farms, Inc | Smith River, CA 95567 | $316,111 |
3 | Reservation Ranch | Smith River, CA 95567 | $229,697 |
4 | Baf Fishers, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $108,830 |
5 | F-v Pacific Pride Inc. | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $103,074 |
6 | Bountiful Oceans, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $84,621 |
7 | Fv Gladnik, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $74,144 |
8 | F/v Pollux, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $71,627 |
9 | David J Shogren | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $68,070 |
10 | Stanco Enterprises, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $66,543 |
11 | Robert Tedsen | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $64,663 |
12 | Fv Donita, LLC | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $64,420 |
13 | Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco Dairy | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $63,126 |
14 | Rose Marie Inc | Gasquet, CA 95543 | $56,968 |
15 | Fv Midori, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $56,552 |
16 | F/v Viking Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $52,045 |
17 | Richard Wetherell | Fort Dick, CA 95538 | $48,591 |
18 | Charles Juke Williams | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $48,500 |
19 | Richard Nehmer | Smith River, CA 95567 | $48,226 |
20 | Darin Alan, Inc | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $45,663 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>