Total Commodity Programs in Fresno County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,447
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Fresno County, California totaled $279,305,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Zonneveld Dairies Inc | Laton, CA 93242 | $1,689,326 |
2 | Casaca Vineyards | Five Points, CA 93624 | $1,672,816 |
3 | Johann Dairy Gp | Fresno, CA 93706 | $1,587,812 |
4 | Shady Acres Dairy | Helm, CA 93627 | $1,532,286 |
5 | J & D Wilson & Sons Dairy Lp | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,513,988 |
6 | Errotabere Ranches | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,466,977 |
7 | Rollin Valley Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,420,611 |
8 | S & S Ranch Inc | Mendota, CA 93640 | $1,377,139 |
9 | Monteiro Bros Dairy Inc | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,375,355 |
10 | Fontes Dairy Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,279,556 |
11 | John De Groot & Son | Fresno, CA 93706 | $1,251,778 |
12 | Fortune Farming 1 | Cantua Creek, CA 93608 | $1,229,501 |
13 | Cornelis Kamper Rodney Kamper Mt Whitney Dairy | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,224,792 |
14 | A & M Farms | Fresno, CA 93706 | $1,193,442 |
15 | Woolf Family Trust No I | Fresno, CA 93711 | $1,098,727 |
16 | Kap, Lp | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $1,095,515 |
17 | Van Der Kooi Family Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $1,090,418 |
18 | Coburn Ranch | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,088,135 |
19 | Marv Coit Farms | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $1,086,938 |
20 | Maddox Farms | Riverdale, CA 93656 | $1,075,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>