Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Glenn County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 78
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Glenn County, California totaled $336,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Argo Family Farms | Princeton, CA 95970 | $49,500 |
| 2 | Perez & Perez Family Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $19,775 |
| 3 | Hjp Ranch | Ovando, MT 59854 | $14,765 |
| 4 | Johnson Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $11,375 |
| 5 | Gary Gregory | Elk Creek, CA 95939 | $10,500 |
| 6 | Bernie Millsaps Estate | Orland, CA 95963 | $10,500 |
| 7 | Attinger Ag Inc | Chico, CA 95973 | $10,500 |
| 8 | Stonyford Ranch LLC | Woodland, CA 95695 | $10,069 |
| 9 | Lc Properties | Butte City, CA 95920 | $7,000 |
| 10 | Martin Bros | Willows, CA 95988 | $7,000 |
| 11 | Harold-alvin And Carol Von Bargen | Artois, CA 95913 | $7,000 |
| 12 | Kurt & Pam Cundiff | Glenn, CA 95943 | $5,800 |
| 13 | Whyler Co | Willows, CA 95988 | $5,443 |
| 14 | Arvell H Erickson Trust | Orland, CA 95963 | $4,667 |
| 15 | John And Toni Erickson Family Trust - John Erickso | Orland, CA 95963 | $4,667 |
| 16 | Roger A Erickson | Half Moon Bay, CA 94019 | $4,666 |
| 17 | Dennis And Mary Jo Burreson Irrev | Orland, CA 95963 | $3,500 |
| 18 | Mary Jo Burreson | Orland, CA 95963 | $3,500 |
| 19 | Rodney Pozzi Estat | Artois, CA 95913 | $3,500 |
| 20 | David Alves | Princeton, CA 95970 | $3,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf