Farm Subsidy information
Glenn County, California
Total Subsidies in Glenn County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 855
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glenn County, California totaled $45,485,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenwood Dairy | Baltic, SD 57003 | $1,293,349 |
| 2 | Black Rock Cattle LLC | Glenn, CA 95943 | $871,164 |
| 3 | Walker Creek Partners LLC | Chico, CA 95928 | $811,456 |
| 4 | Alves Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $778,133 |
| 5 | Cook-keyawa, LLC | Chico, CA 95927 | $700,662 |
| 6 | Knight Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $642,294 |
| 7 | J G Weststeyn Dairy Lp | Willows, CA 95988 | $641,159 |
| 8 | E Franklin Larrabee & Assoc | Chico, CA 95926 | $602,466 |
| 9 | Henry Jongsma And Son Dairy | Orland, CA 95963 | $562,900 |
| 10 | North Valley Nut Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $557,216 |
| 11 | Lohse Bros | Glenn, CA 95943 | $556,472 |
| 12 | Mtsj Dairy Lp | Orland, CA 95963 | $553,666 |
| 13 | Lohse Ranch | Glenn, CA 95943 | $550,266 |
| 14 | J & W Farms Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $536,511 |
| 15 | Goedhart Dairy | Orland, CA 95963 | $520,249 |
| 16 | Vereschagin Farms Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $502,455 |
| 17 | Van Tol Dairy Number II | Orland, CA 95963 | $485,709 |
| 18 | Lowe Cattle Co Inc | Chico, CA 95928 | $468,240 |
| 19 | Gsa Farms Inc | Willows, CA 95988 | $453,051 |
| 20 | Argo Orchards | Princeton, CA 95970 | $452,516 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf