Farm Subsidy information
Imperial County, California
Total Subsidies in Imperial County, California, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 143
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Imperial County, California totaled $6,838,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tnt Management Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $189,144 |
| 2 | Bullfrog Farms | Imperial, CA 92251 | $131,554 |
| 3 | Russell D Allen | Brawley, CA 92227 | $120,710 |
| 4 | Kenneth Ashurst | Westmorland, CA 92281 | $116,750 |
| 5 | K Brandon Ashurst | Brawley, CA 92227 | $116,750 |
| 6 | Kevin Grizzle Farms LLC | Holtville, CA 92250 | $116,654 |
| 7 | La Valle Sabbia Inc | El Centro, CA 92243 | $106,440 |
| 8 | Steven G Dahm | Brawley, CA 92227 | $106,414 |
| 9 | Russell Brian Allen | Brawley, CA 92227 | $105,638 |
| 10 | Amc Farms LLC | Brawley, CA 92227 | $101,593 |
| 11 | Greg Benner | Brawley, CA 92227 | $97,656 |
| 12 | Rick & Lori Young Jv | Brawley, CA 92227 | $94,115 |
| 13 | Rothfleisch Ranches Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $80,326 |
| 14 | Ben Abatti Jr | Holtville, CA 92250 | $79,583 |
| 15 | Martin Auza Sheep Co | Brawley, CA 92227 | $75,302 |
| 16 | Steven A Stuhr | Holtville, CA 92250 | $74,597 |
| 17 | Desert Dunes Dairy Gp | Imperial, CA 92251 | $70,614 |
| 18 | Vessey & Company Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $58,985 |
| 19 | River Valley Ranches Gp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $57,350 |
| 20 | Imperial Ag LLC | Imperial, CA 92251 | $57,252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf