Farm Subsidy information
Kings County, California
Total Subsidies in Kings County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 429
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kings County, California totaled $38,277,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dairy Avenue LLC | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $646,396 |
| 2 | North Dairy Lp | Hanford, CA 93230 | $506,842 |
| 3 | Four Star Dairy Lp | Tulare, CA 93274 | $501,418 |
| 4 | Wild Oak Farms Inc | Kingsburg, CA 93631 | $501,258 |
| 5 | Gilkey Five | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $493,579 |
| 6 | Cloverdale Farms | Hanford, CA 93230 | $419,385 |
| 7 | Flavio Almeida Martins Top Line Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $412,697 |
| 8 | Hewitson Farms Pts | Avenal, CA 93204 | $335,680 |
| 9 | Droogh Dairy Lp | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $320,530 |
| 10 | Sozinho Dairy Inc | Hanford, CA 93230 | $318,892 |
| 11 | Zonneveld Farms | Laton, CA 93242 | $306,802 |
| 12 | Mattos Family Limited Partnership | Hanford, CA 93230 | $301,317 |
| 13 | Rolling Hills Farms | Oceano, CA 93445 | $267,404 |
| 14 | David Te Velde | Hanford, CA 93230 | $250,000 |
| 15 | Alice Te Velde | Hanford, CA 93230 | $250,000 |
| 16 | Netto Ag Inc Double N Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $249,481 |
| 17 | Silva & Son Dairy | Hanford, CA 93230 | $241,015 |
| 18 | Dalena Property Company LLC | Madera, CA 93636 | $238,192 |
| 19 | Harold Dragt & Sons Dairies LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $216,268 |
| 20 | Freitas Farms I | Hanford, CA 93232 | $188,849 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf