Farm Subsidy information

Los Angeles County, California

Total Subsidies in Los Angeles County, California, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 262

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Los Angeles County, California totaled $17,963,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1High Desert Dairy LLCLancaster, CA 93535$1,337,562
2Dick David Diana & Douglas ZylstraLa Verne, CA 91750$1,143,721
3T-y Nursery IncTorrance, CA 90503$500,000
4High Desert DairyLancaster, CA 93535$464,609
5Barnes Family TrustLancaster, CA 93536$421,529
6B & D Cattle CoTehachapi, CA 93561$292,546
7San Pedro Pride, Inc.Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275$250,000
8Cal Crystal Sea, LLCSan Pedro, CA 90731$250,000
9More Carnage, LLCLong Beach, CA 90803$250,000
10Ritter & GoddeLancaster, CA 93584$235,849
11Cape Blanco Fishing, LpBellevue, WA 98007$216,833
12Honey Pacifica CompanyDowney, CA 90242$214,019
13Jacob MollaLakewood, CA 90712$213,876
14Augello Enterprises, LLCLong Beach, CA 90813$200,621
15Terry A Munz FarmingLancaster, CA 93536$188,424
16Blum RanchActon, CA 93510$186,106
17Honey Pacifica IncDowney, CA 90242$175,806
18Norwalk DairySanta Fe Springs, CA 90670$158,264
19Aroma Orchids Of Rowland HeightsRowland Heights, CA 91748$156,629
20J Deluca Fish Company, Inc.San Pedro, CA 90731$155,288

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag