Total Commodity Programs in Los Angeles County, California, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 174

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Los Angeles County, California totaled $8,279,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1High Desert Dairy LLCLancaster, CA 93535$1,337,562
2Dick David Diana & Douglas ZylstraLa Verne, CA 91750$1,143,721
3T-y Nursery IncTorrance, CA 90503$500,000
4High Desert DairyLancaster, CA 93535$288,255
5San Pedro Pride, Inc.Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275$250,000
6Cal Crystal Sea, LLCSan Pedro, CA 90731$250,000
7More Carnage, LLCLong Beach, CA 90803$250,000
8Cape Blanco Fishing, LpBellevue, WA 98007$216,833
9Jacob MollaLakewood, CA 90712$213,876
10Augello Enterprises, LLCLong Beach, CA 90813$200,621
11Ritter & GoddeLancaster, CA 93584$198,349
12Aroma Orchids Of Rowland HeightsRowland Heights, CA 91748$156,629
13J Deluca Fish Company, Inc.San Pedro, CA 90731$155,288
14Triton FishingSan Pedro, CA 90731$149,898
15Ironwood Unlimited, Inc. Dba El Nativo GrowerLa Crescenta, CA 91214$140,931
16Norwalk DairySanta Fe Springs, CA 90670$134,328
17Mike's Produce IncDowney, CA 90241$131,192
18Barnes Family TrustLancaster, CA 93536$124,826
19C S Larsen & SonsLancaster, CA 93536$122,754
20Michel AnsolabehereLancaster, CA 93536$104,823

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag