Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Madera County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 510
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Madera County, California totaled $11,686,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Capstone Ranch Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $114,917 |
22 | Vincent Taylor | Madera, CA 93637 | $106,567 |
23 | Pardis Orchards Lp | Los Angeles, CA 90045 | $106,554 |
24 | Bapu Farming Co. Inc | Madera, CA 93637 | $99,793 |
25 | Thandi Brothers Farms Inc | Fresno, CA 93745 | $97,825 |
26 | Red Top Jerseys Lp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $97,618 |
27 | Thiara Orchards | Yuba City, CA 95993 | $96,456 |
28 | David L Davis | Madera, CA 93637 | $94,509 |
29 | Arunjoat Toor | Visalia, CA 93277 | $91,244 |
30 | Shein Ranch Dba South Point Ranch East | Madera, CA 93637 | $90,664 |
31 | Gc Almonds LLC | Fresno, CA 93727 | $88,058 |
32 | Austin J Whitley | Stanfield, NC 28163 | $87,533 |
33 | J. Vierra Pistachio Ranch, Inc | Madera, CA 93638 | $85,772 |
34 | George Crafton A & G Farms | Madera, CA 93637 | $79,661 |
35 | Silveira Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $78,861 |
36 | Dos Rios Ranch Dba South Point Ranch West | Madera, CA 93637 | $78,690 |
37 | Richard De Benedetto | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $76,226 |
38 | Zinke Farms Inc | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $75,155 |
39 | Fagundes Brothers LLC | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $74,484 |
40 | Harris Farms Lp | Madera, CA 93637 | $72,467 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”