Total Disaster Programs in Marin County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 253
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Marin County, California totaled $8,107,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mcdonald Ranches | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $338,712 |
2 | Neil Mcisaac & Son Inc | Tomales, CA 94971 | $338,419 |
3 | Earl J Dolcini | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $247,515 |
4 | G B T Nunes & Co | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $233,950 |
5 | Luke Stevens | Marshall, CA 94940 | $231,156 |
6 | Spaletta Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $195,538 |
7 | Dan Evans | Inverness, CA 94937 | $186,974 |
8 | Manuel B Brazil | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $182,109 |
9 | William Barboni II | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $174,183 |
10 | Cypress Lane Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $161,130 |
11 | Mcisaac Dairy | Novato, CA 94947 | $151,756 |
12 | Mcdonald Lucchesi Cattle | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $144,400 |
13 | Chileno Valley Vineyards Inc | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $131,327 |
14 | Joseph Vieira | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $130,109 |
15 | Kehoe Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $126,793 |
16 | J H Mendoza And Company | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $125,627 |
17 | Lafranchi Ranch | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $119,757 |
18 | L Corda & Sons | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $109,683 |
19 | Thornton Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $103,599 |
20 | Moretti Family Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $102,347 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>